Your fight doesn't end on election night. It moves to the committee room. Minerva treats legislative work as a first-class campaign: members, petitions, legislators, bills, and testimony in one system whose memory survives the session.
You know who opens emails. You don't know which members are voters, which districts they can move, or which legislator answers to them. Mobilization stays generic because the data can't make it specific.
Bills move fast at the end of session. By the time the hearing notice circulates, you have a day to find witnesses, draft testimony, and turn out bodies.
The organizer who knew every committee chair left, and the knowledge left with them. Next session, your new staff re-learns the State House from scratch.
| Legislator | District | Position | Your members |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chair M. Ellery | HD-31 | Leaning yes | 312 |
| Vice Chair R. Stanton | HD-09 | Committed yes | 187 |
| Rep. T. Nguyen | HD-44 | Undeclared | 441 |
| Rep. C. Albright | HD-16 | Undeclared | 256 |
| Rep. J. Forsythe | HD-52 | Opposed | 88 |
From hearing notice to outcome, tracked like field work. Position maps weight every committee member by your membership in their district, so Thursday's action alert goes to the 441 members who can move the undeclared vote.
Advocacy organizations that engage in electoral work get the same field stack campaigns use (canvassing, phones, GOTV) pointed at your issue universe instead of a candidate's. One membership base, both modes.
Tell us your issue, your membership size, and your next legislative fight. We'll show you what compounding institutional memory looks like.
Start the conversation →